<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Better SEO Linking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.viloria.net/archives/better-seo-linking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.viloria.net/archives/better-seo-linking/</link>
	<description>Relaxed Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DeathMitten</title>
		<link>http://www.viloria.net/archives/better-seo-linking/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>DeathMitten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 09:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.viloria.net/archives/better-seo-linking/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Thank you!

Of course, the thing about SEO is, the more popular a certain method is, the less effective ti gets. It sort of inflates. that, and search engine management often adjusts for SEO tricks.

But if your site has genuine, quality content - as Viloria.net does, for example - then SEO can be a valid tool. But the best thing to do is to still focust on content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you!</p>
<p>Of course, the thing about SEO is, the more popular a certain method is, the less effective ti gets. It sort of inflates. that, and search engine management often adjusts for SEO tricks.</p>
<p>But if your site has genuine, quality content &#8211; as Viloria.net does, for example &#8211; then SEO can be a valid tool. But the best thing to do is to still focust on content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

